The monocrat is typically being hated (though nobody dares to speak out against him), whilst the monarch can possibly be much-loved as an image or as a mediated idol even by people who have otherwise no personal relation with him. It seems that the monarchy (and, in it, the monarch) enjoys some popular and/or constitutional support, whereas the monocracy (and, in it, the monocrat) is more of a autocratic tyranny with enforced despotism as the main method of governance. The difference between monarchy and monocracy is mostly a difference in "feeling" that is quite difficult to pin-point. The word monocracy does exist indeed (in German: Monokratie), and also exists the word autocracy. Can help if you have any Ancient Greek specific questions. You'd see some other types, some using the word νόμος (nomos = law) in there as well, but I can't think of any off the top of my head that stuck around into the modern era (that's not saying there aren't any though, I'm sure someone will soon post a giant list that makes me go "duh." Monarchy = μόνος (one) archos (is leader)Īs for why they're like this and not the other way around, most of them are attested in Ancient Greek itself: μοναρχία, δημοκρατίᾱ, etc. So democracy was a word meaning the common people rule/have power. δῆμος (demos) means - in this sense - "the people" and usually referred to the common people. Let's look at democracy, the cracy bit here comes from the Ancient Greek word κράτος which is strength, power, might, etc. Putting an alpha, or an alpha nu before a word in ancient Greek reverses it or nullifies it, so you get the word ἄναρχος (anarchos) "without a leader" (anarchy) so these words are focused more on who is leading. Ἀρχός is an Ancient Greek word for leader or ruler.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |